2006
Taking Seriously the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Section Introduction
Gary J. Kornblith & Carol Lasser Article
Uncoverage: Toward a Signature Pedagogy for the History Survey
Lendol Calder Article
Ways of Seeing: An Introduction
Michael Coventry, Peter Felten, David Jaffee, Cecilia O’Leary, and
Tracey Weis, with Susannah McGowan Article
Thinking Visually as Historians: Incorporating Visual Methods
David Jaffee Article
Confronting Prior Visual Knowledge, Beliefs, and Habits: “Seeing”
beyond the Surface
Peter Felten Article
What’s the Problem? Connecting Scholarship, Interpretation, and
Evidence in Telling Stories about Race and Slavery
Tracey Weis Article
Moving beyond "the Essay": Evaluating Historical Analysis and
Argument in Multimedia Presentations
Michael Coventry Article
Connecting to the Public: Using New Media to Engage Students in
the Iterative Process of History
Cecila O’Leary Article
Ways of Seeing: A Conclusion
Michael Coventry, Peter Felten, David Jaffee, Cecilia O’Leary, and
Tracey Weis, with Susannah McGowan Article
Thinking Visually as Historians: Incorporating Visual Methods
David Jaffee
When students encounter images, they often offer incomplete readings, demonstrating
difficulty integrating their insightful visual readings with contextual historical understanding.
When asked to "look" and "react" to images, they frame responses that open
and close with immediate reactions. All too often, visual materials promote relatively
simplistic emotional interpretations because the student viewers offer freestanding responses
based solely on the image before them, unencumbered by the context or additional
documentation historians use to make meaning with such powerful visual documents.
Studying the way my students looked at visual materials, I realized that word
and image needed to be reunited if students were to learn to think visually as historians.
I came to this conclusion by taking the pedagogical turn: watching my students look,
paying attention to the intermediate steps they took on their way to understanding historical
problems and mastering the use of sources. Analyzing their work in the light of
the scholarship of teaching and learning has helped me develop a strategy that pushes
students to see historical context, connection, and complexity as they develop interpretative
strategies for visual sources.
For several years, I have collected evidence of student learning as a result of doing the
online viewing assignments in my urban culture course, Power, Race, and Culture in the
U.S. City, taught at the City College of New York. From the start, students were eager
to look at the images as well as the historical and literary texts I posted for them. But
the exercise of putting them together, of moving back and forth as a historian might do,
proved elusive for many. When they moved onto the terrain of images, many students
offered suggestive readings of the individual images before them, and they even referred
to other visual materials, but few could integrate multiple sources into an interpretative
narrative.
I saw evidence of this difficulty when I asked my students to look at the 1941 murals
at the Health and Human Services Building, created by Seymour Fogel, and to describe
and interpret what they saw. Henry wrote:
The painting "Industrial life" by Seymour Fogel (1941) echoes an Urban industrial
society. In the painting, we can view five men at work. The artist is trying to project
a sense of economic labor values that all America should follow and be aware
of. Labor and Industrial is seen as one, the viewer in 1941 should have seen this
painting as a positive step for his country. In the painting different labor is being
introduced, from the scientist to the train conductor. The colors of the painting
are flat tones and the drawings are simple in form. The art work was being in the
Washington. D.C. Health and Human [Services] building, words to encourage the
people to strive forward!!
David Jaffee uses Seymour Fogel’s Industrial Life (1941) in an image-viewing assignment for his course Power, Race, and Culture in the U.S. City at the City College of New York. Courtesy Smithsonian American Art Museum, Transfer from the General Services Administration.
Most students followed Henry, with general comments about the industrial character
of the objects, drawn from the muralsà titles, for example, and from the figures. They referred
to the imageÃs visual qualities or its historical significance but were unable to weave
the parts into a larger whole. A few students expressed more complicated understandings
of the images as visual constructions. Olivia perceived that portrayal of industrial work
in a "romanticized light" as a historical change from earlier representations. Arthur, commenting on another of the murals, pointed out their idealized nature, connecting them to
other New Deal and World War IIñera art, including the paintings of Norman Rockwell
and the photographs of Dorothea Lange, both discussed in earlier classes. He could relate
the medium of the mural as well as the significance of FogelÃs style of drawing (which
he likened to "a way that marble might be sculpted into statues") to the muralsà message,
their "monumental" representation of the force of family life.12
Yet, like most other students, Arthur did not raise relevant questions of patronage and
audience or muse about the historical "purpose" of the mural project.13 Henry did attend
to placement, but his visual analysis was slim and unconnected to his thematic framework.
Even when Olivia and Arthur offered sophisticated understandings of the images,
they did not connect their visual readings to text-based course materialsóprimary and
secondary. Even the best students that first year offered separate, unintegrated readings
of textsóvisual and literary.
Analyzing their efforts, I realized that students needed more scaffolding so that they
could learn to move between historical, literary, and visual materials. Perhaps, I thought,
I could create an online miniarchive, selecting sources that could enrich the complexity of
their readings while helping them keep the context in sight. I wanted their experience in
the miniarchive to model how scholars revisit their assumptions in a recursive process of
intertextuality, repeatedly moving back and forth among texts and other sources as they
weave them together.
My new assignment asked students to look at two 1837 portraits of Indian leaders: Wij˙n-
jon, PigeonÃs Egg Head (The Light) Going To and Returning From Washington by George
Catlin and Keokuk: Chief of the Sacs by Charles Bird King.14 Each then wrote "a paragraph
or two explaining what you see," a provisional interpretation the student shared with a
partner before moving into a miniarchive containing documents selected to help the
students situate the two representations: more portraits; speeches by Keokuk; text from
Thomas Loraine McKenneyÃs History of the Indian Tribes of North America, where the Keokuk
portrait appeared; writings by George Catlin about PigeonÃs Egg Head; and two
extensive Web sites. From this miniarchive, students selected two documents that they
thought added context and meaning to their initial reaction to the portraits.
At the City College of New York, David Jaffee asks students to use a miniarchive of documents to assist them in interpreting George Catlin’s Wi-jún-jon, Pigeon’s Egg Head (The Light) Going To and Returning From Washington (1837–1839). Courtesy Smithsonian American Art Museum, Gift of Mrs. Joseph Harrison Jr.
Students encountering George CatlinÃs 1837ñ1839 portrait of PigeonÃs Egg Head often
flatten their readings to fit into what they initially understand as the starkly contrasting
choices of accommodation or resistance, sellout or revolt, facing Native American leaders
in the early nineteenth century. The visual and textual materials of the miniarchive
prodded students to move beyond those dichotomies, developing their historical reasoning
and realizing more complex understandings. Using these additional sources to inform
her reading of the Catlin portrait, Isadora imaginatively reconstructed the AssiniboinesÃ
response to their leaderÃs foolish exchange of his "impressive Indian accoutrements" for
foppish attire, including his high-heeled boots, fan, and umbrella, and the liquor bottle in
his back pocket, interpreting his actions as compromise in the face of overbearing force.
When Isadora turned to the Keokuk portrait, she continued to wrestle with the ambiguity
of the image:
When looking at this painting of Keokuk, one feels that there is something different
about this majestic Indian chief. The feathers and animalsà skins indicate that
he is a powerful, typical Indian chief. . . . But what makes this Indian chief sort of
ambiguous? Why does he convey both Indian pride and strength and the acceptance
of whitesà values?
Additional sources, McKenneyÃs History of the Indian Tribes of North America and information
on the interpretative stance of the painter Charles Bird King, helped her contextualize
the portrait:
In fact, Keokuk refused to collaborate with another Sac chief (Black Hawk) to
fight against the whites, who were going to take their lands. He accepted to exile
with his followers and was therefore much respected by the American government.
He succeeded in constantly convincing his people not to join the war because he
knewóaccording to Thomas McKenney, who was commissioner of Indian affairs
between 1824 and 1830óthat they would be defeated. He is generally depicted as
a strong, determined and very tactic person. And [King] clearly depicts this sort
of dichotomy that characterizes Keokuk: he was both a typical Indian chief who,
with calm and realism, governed and protected his people and a good negotiator
who knew how to deal with the whites. That is why he still appears as a majestic,
respected chief on the painting, unless the painter, as it was often said about him
and his passion for the Indians, idealized the character and improved the reality of
the time.
Moving beyond conventional accounts that frame Native American choices as either accommodation
or resistance, Isadora had begun to tell a far more complex and messy historical story of a leader who had to wend his way through competing native factions and
a welter of governmental officials, local and national, as well as deal with the divergent
demands of settlers and reformers. She also understood that the sourcesóboth texts and
visualsówere not unmediated; the Native American voiceóand bodyócomes down to
us through Anglo hands and transcriptions. Yet, looking at the portraits by Catlin and
King, she had seen some of the layers of complexities that allowed their subjects to represent
themselves through pose and costume rather than merely to be represented by the
painter. Like John Singleton CopleyÃs wealthy merchant subjects, CatlinÃs PigeonÃs Egg
Head and KingÃs Keokuk collaborated in constructing their likenesses. Isadora demonstrated
how students can learn to read portraits in their historical context, appreciating
complexity.15
Like most students, Isadora had plunged into the miniarchive to select specific texts
directly relating to the portraits. Her classmate Judy used the miniarchive differently. She
chose sources seemingly distant from the original portraits: an appeal by the Cherokee
chief John Ross protesting Indian removal in the 1830s and the exoticized depiction of
vanquished Indian leaders on the cover of an early twentieth-century popular periodical.
These she deployed to explore the broader topic of the perils of assimilation. Here, she
modeled the practice of an expert or professional historian who enters an archive with a
series of questions or a tentative hypothesis in search of evidence, pulling apparently unconnected
texts into a relationship and then constructing a plausible story.
By yoking portraits and prose together, this exercise moved beyond the mere addition
of images as illustrations, instead helping students think visually as historians. In creating
the miniarchive, I wanted to push students away from freestanding looking and toward
historically contextualized seeing of the visual evidence. Watching Isadora and other students
move from examining a single image to comparing two images and then to contextualizing
particular portraits within a miniarchive of word and image, I learned how
students gain an understanding of the complex strategies that Indian leaders devised in
the early nineteenth century. Students discovered for themselves the coexistence of choice
and constraint. They came to appreciate how the power and pressure of the new American
state limited PigeonÃs Egg Head and Keokuk but how the two leaders nonetheless deployed
imaginative strategies to navigate the new political world that they faced.
Like their subjects, historians too face constraintsóthe use of evidence, modes of documentary
analysis, the need to connect the local event to larger themes or topicsóthat
close off possibilities and hem in interpretations. But we also have choicesóabout what
we teach and how we teach. I have used the scholarship of teaching and learning to develop
new strategies for integrating visual materials with other sources to help students
comprehend context, to develop their understanding in a way not possible using textual
sources alone. My intention is to build scaffolding that helps students to see beyond the
simple, to formulate provisional questions for inquiry, to encounter new sources, and
then to revise their earlier assertions. In this way, I hope to help students learn the process
of historical reasoning.
12 OLIVIA: "'The Industrial life' picture seems to view industrial work in a romanticized light, which contrasts
with the way it originally used to be represented. Early in the century, industrial life was seen as unsanitary, dangerous,
menial work, fit for only the poor. This picture, however, uses vivid, warm colors, clean cut and clear drawn
lines. I think after WWII (this picture was created in 1941) there seemed to be more of a romanticized view of technology
and industry and all that can be accomplished. The picture shows 4 types of work being done that are necessary
to an industrial society. There's the scientist, the architect, the worker, and I guess the engineer.
"The second picture 'Security of the Family' is supposed to represent family life and roles during the 40s. The
woman (the mother) is seen holding a childóobviously meaning that women were expected to be mothers and
child rearers. The Father is seen as being more 'intellectual,' sitting down at the table, seeming to have an important
air about him. The girl is drawing, to represent that girls are seen as being artistic. The young boy is playing tennis.
It shows that girls are supposed to 'act like girls,' being calm and 'cultured.' Boys seem to have more liberties in
their manner of behavior."
ARTHUR: "Seymour Fogel's painting, 'Security of the Family,' reminds me of Norman Rockwell's paintings, 'The
Four Freedoms.' The Rockwell image from that group that comes to mind most immediately is the one where the
child is being tucked into bed with the father looking on holding a newspaper containing terrifying headlines.
"Both Rockwell and Fogel are presenting idealized images of American society, but they're different. Fogel is not
seeking to portray the warmth and intimacy of the kind that Rockwell seeks to portray. Fogel's figures, drawn in the
way that marble might be sculpted into statues, present Family Life as a monumental, larger than life force.
"The sky overhead may be gray and over cast, but the motheróstaring out into the undefined future much as
the mother in Lange's 'Migrant Mother'óis, like the other members of the family, stolid, sturdy, unwavering in
their march forward into the unknown."
13 See Barbara Melosh, Engendering Culture: Manhood and Womanhood in New Deal Public Art and Theater (Washington, 1991).
15 See Brian W. Dippie, George Catlin and His Indian Gallery (Washington, 2002); Thomas Loraine McKenney,
History of the Indian Tribes of North America, with Biographical Sketches and Anecdotes of the Principal Chiefs Embellished
with One Hundred and Twenty Portraits from the Indian Gallery in the Department of War (3 vols., Philadelphia,
1838ñ1844); Richard White, The Middle Ground: Indians, Empires, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region,
1650ñ1815 (New York, 1991); Carrie Rebora, John Singleton Copley in America (New York, 1995).